InfoMagic Internet Tools 1995 April/Internet Tools.iso/dos_win/winsock/maillist/94-04.Z/94-04/text0082.txt

Text File | 1994-04-30 | 6.4 KB | 153 lines

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Jon Lewis) writes:
>From: [e-mail] (Jon Lewis)
>Subject: Re: WinIrc
>Date: Mon, 4 Apr 1994 23:58:58 UNDEFINED

>In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (David A Wolfe) writes:
>>From: [e-mail] (David A Wolfe)
>>Subject: WinIrc
>>Date: Mon, 4 Apr 1994 20:27:59

>>I've installed winsock 10b and WinIrc still loses connection.

>>In fact I'm not even getting logged on, as I was in the past.

>>I need to have this up and running by April 16th so.........

>No offense intended...but why do you Need WinIRC up and running.  Are there
>actually legitimate (non-time wasting) reasons to use WinIRC?



well win irc seems to be a tricky program. have you tried another server yet?
that is hat fixed some of my problems(still looking for a client that does dcc)
otherwise might i sudgest that you get a dos client and use that on april 16th
(since thats when you said you needed it by) and then work on fixing winirc.
hope this helps


-Sargon                                  Ftp for windows and winsock files
[e-mail]                        'b61503.student.cwru.edu'
                     "The only perfect science is hindsight."
From [e-mail] Sat Apr  5 15:59:14 1994
Received: from bigblue.oit.unc.edu by SunSITE.Unc.EDU (5.65c+IDA/FvK-1.07) with SMTP
          id AA16738; Tue, 5 Apr 1994 19:12:30 -0400
Received: by bigblue.oit.unc.edu (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA24994; Tue, 5 Apr 1994 18:09:35 -0500
Received: from GATEWAY by bigblue with netnews
    for [e-mail] ([e-mail])
To: [e-mail]
Date: 5 Apr 1994 15:59:14 GMT
From: [e-mail] (Darryl Friesen)
Message-Id: <2ns1si$[e-mail]>
Organization: University of Saskatchewan
Sender: ses
References: <slawek.765069978@aries>, <2nf0cl$[e-mail]>, <2np7nt$[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Problems with new MS TCP-32 and WFW 3.11

On 4 Apr 1994 14:20:45 GMT Steve Eckhardt ([e-mail]) wrote:
> In article <2nf0cl$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Darryl Friesen) says:
> >
> >On 30 Mar 94 23:26:18 GMT Slawomir Z. Janicki ([e-mail]) wrote:
> >> [e-mail] (Darryl Friesen) writes:
> >
> >> >Has anyone else experienced probems with Micosoft's new TCP/IP
> >> >stack (the March beta) and Winsock apps?
> >
> >[snip snip]

> >I have always used for DOS and Winsock apps.  Still no luck with
> >HGopher or Mosaic. (could it be related to the lack of DNS support
> >in this version?)
> >
> I'm confused.  I was mailed a copy of the MS TCP/IP, and it includes support
> for DNS.  Is this a difference between what I got and what you got?  (Note:
> the ping does not support DNS.)

> Steve Eckhardt  ([e-mail])

No Steve, I'm the one who was confused :)  I didn't read the Release Notes
close enough. I misread the line "DNS resolution of Windows Network names
and WINS resolution of DNS names is NOT supported in this release."

BTW, All seems to be working now.  It's almost as if it fixed itself
somehow.  Weird.

- Darryl

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
   Darryl Friesen, Client Services              [e-mail]
   Department of Computing Services          University of Saskatchewan
   <A HREF="http://gopher.usask.ca/~friesend/">This is my Home Page</A>
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
  "Heck, they won't even let me speak for myself"
From [e-mail] Sat Apr  5 09:02:48 1994
Received: from bigblue.oit.unc.edu by SunSITE.Unc.EDU (5.65c+IDA/FvK-1.07) with SMTP
          id AA24787; Tue, 5 Apr 1994 20:12:28 -0400
Received: by bigblue.oit.unc.edu (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA09477; Tue, 5 Apr 1994 18:47:04 -0500
Received: from GATEWAY by bigblue with netnews
    for [e-mail] ([e-mail])
To: [e-mail]
Date: 5 Apr 1994 13:02:48 -0400
From: [e-mail] (De Wys)
Message-Id: <2ns5jo$[e-mail]>
Organization: BASF Corporation, Parsippany, NJ
Sender: ses
References: <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: LWP and Gopher

>In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Sal Collora) writes:
>
>>We here at LMU are having a funny problem.  It seems as though when using LWP
>>for DOS (under Windows) we cannot Gopher to "gopher.tc.umn.edu".  It just sits
>>and tries to connect.

I have had the same problems. However I am going thru a firewall machine.
Has anyone had any experience in getting a Windows gopher client to work
thru a firewall? I can run gopher thru WinMosaic but that is slow and has
been known to cause some GPFs.


Ted


--
  * Ted DeWys              [e-mail]                   *
  *          All opinions are mine, not my employers              *
  * Parsippany, NJ USA     Oranje Wereldkampioen 1994             *
  * VOICE: 1-201-316-3665  FAX: [phone]                    *
From [e-mail] Mon Apr  4 15:45:26 1994
Received: from bigblue.oit.unc.edu by SunSITE.Unc.EDU (5.65c+IDA/FvK-1.07) with SMTP
          id AA01832; Tue, 5 Apr 1994 21:12:30 -0400
Received: by bigblue.oit.unc.edu (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA21199; Tue, 5 Apr 1994 19:53:20 -0500
Received: from GATEWAY by bigblue with netnews
    for [e-mail] ([e-mail])
To: [e-mail]
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 1994 15:45:26 GMT
From: [e-mail] (David L. Brooks)
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
Organization: Idaho National Engineering Lab
Sender: ses
References: <2nmasl$[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: NTP (net time protocol) clients?

In article <2nmasl$[e-mail]> [e-mail] ( ) writes:

>Are there any winsocket compliant NTP (network time protocol) clients out
>there in the public/share domain?

I know someone who is working on one (he's about two cubicles down from me).
The NTP part seems to be very solid, and works on a number of stacks.  Once he
is done, I'm hoping he'll put it on the net.  That's not an easy process
around here ... you might give it some time.  Feel free to check back with me
in about, say, a month, if you wish.

Best regards,
Dave

David L. Brooks       | "Through the gateway; off the repeater; over the
[e-mail]   | T-1 backbone ... nothing but net!"